Hi,
error of accounting issue is happning while billing doc release to accounting.
Entry of tax for O7 000 9001 312> is not possible because of tax base 0
Message no. FF848
we are on ECC 6.0
SAP_APPL-Logistics and Accounting
RELEASE 605
LEVEL 0009
HIGHEST SUPPORT SAPKH60509
please suggest..
hi experts,
can anyone tell me the way to get amount from customer to vendor in intercompany billing. because both accounting should be clear one.
regards
tony
Hi Gurus,
we would like to clean up our rebate agreements.
We found really old ones that are still open.No we would like to close them, without creating FI/CO postings or at minimun FI/CO neutral postings.
These rebate agreements are not up to date, still carry accrual information inside 8although the accounts are cleared) and update with VBOF is required. In fact the accrual postings have already been cleared from FI side.
If I now update these agreements with VBOF, a lot of FI/CO - relevant postings - accruals -are created (although not wanted).
I found out that if I create a final invoice for the agreement , create a cancellation and add reason for rejection to the bonus request, the agreement stays in status 'D'.
The next step in testing was to delete the bonus agreement, it is set to status 'C' and a bonus request is created. Invoicing and cancellation of this invoice. But then the information ' agreement is not updated' still occurs.
VBOF is not possible.
My question now is, is there a a possibility to influence the update information of the agreement without creating postings?
Or if the agreement is on status 'D' but not updated, has this any impact on archiving of bonus agreements,invoices later on, performance of SDBONT06...?
Please advise
Best regards
Biko
Hello all,
We are facing an issue with contracts with periodic billing.
Through VF04, when we are doing the billing for item 10 and 1st period successfully, now when we come to VA43 to see the contract details. For the Item 10 the Net value for the billing is not considering the Billed period.
Ex: period 1 value is 100 and same value (100) till period 10.
Now since we have done the billing for period 1 , the net value is shown has 900 instead of 1000.
Please suggest how to fix, any BAPI or program where this calculation is done .
Hello,
Could someone teach me the setps to implement a multi-level intercompany billing?
We have implemented a simple intercompany billing, but now we need a new intermedary company. Is it possible?
Thanks in advance,
Ricard.
Hi Gurus,
I am facing problem at the time of posting an downpayment request to accounting for few of the service materials.
The error is as follows in details,
======================================
No VAT registration numbers are allowed for down payments/requests
Message no. FS229
Diagnosis
You entered a tax code for a down payment or down payment request which is defined as an EC tax code. This is not permitted, since this posting is not subject to EC tax. A tax statement requirement exists upon the delivery of goods to a foreign EC country, but not, however, upon receipt of the down payment.
System Response
The system does not allow the tax code.
Procedure
Use a different tax code or EC-identifier.
===========================================
What changes for TAX configuration I need to carry out to remove this error.
Thanks
Regards
Vinod Naik
hi
i hv set flag at billing type level.
Delivery item text as above.still item text not copy to billing from del.
plz asist
i Hi All,
Is there any configuration in Text Determination where text changed or added in Sales Order after Invoicing will automatically update the text in the invoice OR
Changing the sales text in the Material Master will update the texts in both sales order and invoice automatically.
Is this possible ?
I know that by ticking the reference checkbox text in the previous document will update the text in the subsequent document but in invoice there is no reference checkbox in text determination.
Dear friends/experts,
In a case where in, I will have to configure/integrate with FI in such a way that, when a proforma invoice is generated post PGI, provisional revenue to get generated. I know this is unusual interms of revenue generation in proforma invoicing! But, that is how it has to be and it is just provisional revenue!
I have learnt that, a provisional G/L would be created. Requirement is that, after proforma invoicing, provisional accounting must happen as below;
Debit-Provisional Invoice Amount & Credit-To sale (just provisional and it will not affect customer).
After the approval of the proforma invoice, the above debit&credit will be knocked off (reversed).
Then, when billing is done, actual invoice will be processed. (Debit-customer account & Credit-revenue G/L).
Kindly suggest expert thoughts and suggestions on;
1. Is the provisional accounting (Debit-Provisional Invoice Amount & Credit-To sale) is possible after proforma invoicing? Please elaborate.
2. How SD consultant will play his part interms of integration with FI to make this? What all configuration is required?
Thanks,
Vish
As shown in image, wn i put text for line item as shown in part 1 in delivery , it is not copied to billing doc.
But as shown in part 2, wn i maintain text for item 900001 in delivery doc, then it is copied to billing item text.
System should consider both items as one line item shown in part 1, and text should be copied. what could be solun ? sachin k
Hi,
I have an issue regarding VF06 transaction. Few deliveries are getting billed & few deliveries are not getting billed.
When i check the log in V.21, the error log shows 'Delivery & is currently being processed", for 100+ deliveries that were not processed.
There are no other batch jobs running at the same time. The VF06 job runs after office hours.
I tried scheduling the job at a different time but still the same issue - Delivery & is currently being processed' - appears.
Please note: The user is able to create invoices for ALL deliveries without any issues, in VF06 when run MANUALLY.
I am not sure, what else could be the reason for the error - 'Delivery is currently being processed'.
Please help.
With warm regards
Narain
Hello Experts,
On Maintenance Contracts (VA41) in our company we have a design of a parent item (that has pricing on it) and a child item that has the billing plan on it.The Pricing Procedures are designed in such a way, that all pricing conditions on the parent are set to statistical so it doesn't contribute to Net value on the parent item. There is a condition type on the child item, say ZCPY, that copies the condition type value from the parent, say ZNSV (Net Service Value), that represents item final price.
Since ZCPY is used to represent monthly price of the service item, its calculation type is set to 'M' (as doing this only can guarantee that all months irrespective of being 28, 29, 30 or 31) can get the same monthly price irrespective of number of days in them. So we can't use a Condition type with Calculation type 'C' - Percentage, with 100% rate, which perfectly copies any value.
The problem is that, if we use Condition Value formula to copy the value from parent condition ZNSV to ZCPY, then SAP will interpret the ZCPY value as absolute value, rather than monthly value, and the same value will apply on Billing Plan rows irrespective of the duration between Settlement From and Settlement To dates being a month, a quarter or a year. This is of course incorrect as we want the Billing plan row value to be equal to be ZCPY monthly value, if the Billing plan type is set to Monthly, multiplied by 3 times ZCPY monthly value if the Billing plan type is set to Quarterly etc.
So the only way left to copy the value from parent condition ZNSV to child condition ZCPY is to use Condition Base Value formula. However, we can only set Condition rate (XKMOV-KBETR) and Condition base (XKWERT = XKOMV-KAWRT) in Condition Base Value formula. So what was done earlier, is to divide the parent ZNSV value by Quantity on the item and assign it to Condition rate (XKOMV-KBETR). This will of course cause rounding issues, as the condition rate field XKOMV-KBETR has only two decimal places. This causes the parent price in ZNSV not to match the Billing child price ZCPY, because of loss during rounding of Condtion rate XKOMV-KBETR.
To overcome the limitation, we are assigning ZNSV Condition value (XKOMV-KWERT) directly to Condition rate XKOMV-KBETR and assigning the Quantity value to Condition rate unit (XKOMV-KPEIN).
SAP calculates ZCPY Condition value
= ( Condition Rate (KBETR) * Condition Base (Quantity = KAWRT) ) / Condition rate unit (KPEIN)
= ( ZNSV Condition Value * Quantity ) / Quantity
= ZNSV Condition Value (without rounding issue)
The problem with above approach is the KPEIN is only a 5 digit integer, limiting the Quantity on the item to a maximum 99,999 units. Also, the above approach will not allow for fractional quantities as KPEIN is an integer.
In this context, can anyone here suggest a better way to copy the value from ZNSV on parent item to ZCPY on child billing item? Please note that we can suggest redesigning the parent item to directly do the Billing plan and have its pricing conditions activated from current statistical, as this design already used since long and in tons of Contracts. Also as I said, the calculation type on ZCPY condition can't be changed from 'M' as we want to be monthly price.
Any user-exits or configuration techniques to overcome this? I never thought such a simple thing as copying one condition to the other can be such a mess!!
Hi,
This discussion is raise in reference to an existing discussion
- Example of RVAB02 PP from IDES
rasied by Vaishnavi Tangirala
Hi
Can anyone give me an example of how RVAB02 PP works from IDES? I want an example how accounting entries look like for Sales price inclusive of tax.
I have a problem now that tax code is not getting copied to the Revenue line in accounting doc since iam calculating tax on gross price and not on price after tax.
I will be very grateful for any help regarding this.
Thanks,
Vaishnavi
May I know how was this issue resolved? I am encountering the same problem now.
Thanks,
Leng
Message highlighted in blue was edited & added by: Jyoti Prakash
Hi
In Sales, When creating YF2 billing type one of expected pricing condition type is missing.
However when carry out new pricing --> selected Price type C (Copy manual pricing elements and redetermine *) the condition type pop's up.
This is a manul entry condition type...
How to make this to appear automatic when sales billing document generated.
Regards
MM
Hi Gurus,
we would like to clean up our rebate agreements.
We found really old ones that are still open.No we would like to close them, without creating FI/CO postings or at minimun FI/CO neutral postings.
These rebate agreements are not up to date, still carry accrual information inside 8although the accounts are cleared) and update with VBOF is required. In fact the accrual postings have already been cleared from FI side.
If I now update these agreements with VBOF, a lot of FI/CO - relevant postings - accruals -are created (although not wanted).
I found out that if I create a final invoice for the agreement , create a cancellation and add reason for rejection to the bonus request, the agreement stays in status 'D'.
The next step in testing was to delete the bonus agreement, it is set to status 'C' and a bonus request is created. Invoicing and cancellation of this invoice. But then the information ' agreement is not updated' still occurs.
VBOF is not possible.
My question now is, is there a a possibility to influence the update information of the agreement without creating postings?
Or if the agreement is on status 'D' but not updated, has this any impact on archiving of bonus agreements,invoices later on, performance of SDBONT06...?
Please advise
Best regards
Biko
Hello all,
We are facing an issue with contracts with periodic billing.
Through VF04, when we are doing the billing for item 10 and 1st period successfully, now when we come to VA43 to see the contract details. For the Item 10 the Net value for the billing is not considering the Billed period.
Ex: period 1 value is 100 and same value (100) till period 10.
Now since we have done the billing for period 1 , the net value is shown has 900 instead of 1000.
Please suggest how to fix, any BAPI or program where this calculation is done .
Hi All,
I have few invoices appearing in VFX3 due to pricing error. When I checked the Invoices, UTXE condition is failing in the invoice. This condition type is a group condition and its not determined through condition records and does not have an access sequence. Its triggered successfully in the sales order. Please suggest for the possible solutions. If we cancel the Invoice and recreate, it again ends up with Pricing error.
Thanks,
Regards,
Swathi
Hello SAP Gurus,
I have a problem with a Billing Document and its cancellation, both have not created accounting document.
It seems that the user has cancelled the billing document before it has created accounting document.
Now when we try to release to accounting systems gives the message :
I checked both documents in table VBRK and they have Processing Status C.
What should I do to generate the accounting documents for both billing documents.I can not delete them because they have reserved a Reference number.
Thank you for your time,
Juna
Hello SAP Gurus,
We are in the test fase with Self Billing (VSB1N).
I have assigned Condition Type PDIF to the correct pricing procedure, I have maintained general parameters in OVD4, created numberrange in SNRO for object TRMNO_INT, I have set tolerance in OVD8 and assigned customer in SM31 T661W.
Everything looks fine in verified transmissions (first sted) no errors in verification step and no error in Processing step.
Then I start processing step, but the SBI is finished with error under transmissins after processing.
I get this error:
Msg. Ms MT Output Text
206 V1 E Condition PDIF is missing in pricing procedure A V
I have checked the pricing produrece and PDIF is assigned, I have tried manually to create DR/CR memo and manually adding PDIF, and here there are no problems.
Have anyone experience this problem before.
Thanks and best regards
Pernille
Dear Seniorm Junior and Colleagues,
I want to ask , why is when i created billing document, the accouting document is not generated automatically ?
This is a Normal / Standard Invoice and the customer is already extended to the company code.