Dear SD Experts,
In the retro active process debit memo is getting updated with the value of difference amount + invoice value
Ex: Crated invoice with 10 rs
Now price changed to 15 rs
Now retro billing created with 15 rs ...Actually this to be created with 5 Rupees.
Please let me know where I did missing.
Hello Guys,
There is one issue related to a scenario of Third party Sales with shipping notification. Here the basic process that runs
are : Sales order --- > PR -- > PO --> MIGO --> Billing document --> Vendor Invoice Verification.
In this specific scenario, partial billing is not happening and the billing relevance for item category "B" and in copying control data
from sales order to billing doccument, the biling quantity field is "A".
Could anyone throw some light on the configuration part so that partial invoicing can happen ??? Please make a note of the fact
that billing documents are generated after MIGO is done.
Regards,
Sarthak
Dear All,
While doing PGI an error is coming:
Check Table YISEG: Entry 0000 does not exist . I have checked for the Table YISEG, no such table exists.
Please suggest what could be the possible solution.
Hello,
during a customer project we are creating INVOIC02 (basis type, message type INVOIC) output IDOC's after billing. The field VBRP-PREFE of the billing documents will be always filled. With transaction VV31/VV32 I created condition records for output mode 4.
After creating the IDOC I checked it with transaction BD87. The required E1EDP28 segments are available for each of the billing items but the field PREFE is empty every time. I checked the invoice, field VBRP-PREFE is filled every time.
Than I changed the condition record to output mode 3. I processed the same input data for the billing again (via IDOC with creating the complete document chain). After running the Report RSNAST0D the output IDOC is available and for each of the billing items the field PREFE of segment E1EDP28 had been filled with the right data.
Why it doesn't work for output mode 4?
I set a breakpoint in INCLUDE RVEXIDPO and activated 'Update Debugging'. Nevertheless in output mode 4 the processing didn't stop at the breakpoint, in mode 3 and processing report RSNAST0D it stopped. It looks like that the coding will not be processed in mode 4.
But where will the segment E1EDP28 be created in mode 4?
Regards
Norbert
Hello All,
Client have requirement that for some customers the billing cycle should be 28 days / month and not actual days of month.
I created new Billing Plan Type - ZZ and maintained Days In Month = 28
Days in year = Blank
Calendar ID = Blank
Next billing date - 53 (Monthly)
Assigned this billing plan type ZZ to customer
Billing plan assigned to Item category is 02
No billing plan type assigned to document type
When I create quote I get pop up asking if I want to change billing plan type from 02 to ZZ - which is fine
but when I go to billing plan I see monthly billing plan.
04/01/2016 to 04/30/2016 - Billing date = 04/01/2016
05/01/2016 to 05/31/2016 - Billing date = 05/01/2016
Results I am expecting
04/01/2016 to 04/28/2016 - Billing date = 04/01/2016
04/29/2016 to 05/27/2016 - Billing date = 04/29/2016
Any suggestions what I am Missing?
Thank you,
Hi all,
I would like to know if someone could help to identify the conditions, that once active, will automatically inactivate the ones above.
For example:
If I have a Sales Order with following conditions
1 List Price
2 Std Discount
3 Non Std Discoun
...
If I activate/introduce/call the "Net Price Condition", this condition will automatically make the others inactive (they will appear with the small yellow triangle).
What I would like to do now, is to identify in the system or in the pricing procedure, all the pricing conditions that when they are active they will inactivate all the others above.
Thank you in advance.
Regards,
Miguel
Hi all,
I'm trying to get my heads around how the order-related intercompany billing solution can be used in the following scenario and hope someone can clarify for me whether this is the right solution to achieve what we want to do.
Scenario
We have a service order for company A. Materials and labour can be provided from a different company B. Labour can also be provided from company A. We bill by the customer through resource related billing (RRB) so a billing request will be generated.
Now, if we are to use the order related intercompany billing solution, how do the system know the amount to charge to company A?
Also, if we are not using RRB but rather bill the customer based on a fixed price sales order or contract, how would the system knows how much to charge company B?
Appreciate any advice on the above.
Cheers!
SF
Hi all,
I have several sales order items that have conditions that become inactivated and I cant identify a reason.
So I have the following situation (see this as one item of a sales order):
| Condition Type | KINAK - Inactive | Condition Class | Statistic | Condition Category |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZPR0 | Y | B | (blank) | (blank) |
| KUMU | Y | A | Y | (blank) |
| ZD01 | Y | A | (blank) | (blank) |
| ZST3 | Y | B | Y | (blank) |
| ZNTP | (blank) | B | (blank) | (blank) |
We can see that ZNTP also inactivates conditions from another condition class.
I have also checked the condition exclusion groups (table T684G) and which groups would exclude others (T684S), however the condition ZNTP is not in any exclusion group there.....
Can someone help me with this? What other "exclusion rules" should I consider despite the condition class and condition exclusion group?
Would it be possible to inactivate conditions manually?
Thank you very much in advance.
Best Regards,
Miguel Santos
Hello All,
We are trying to evaluate and use the SAP R/3 rebates functionality and have a requirement to settle rebates partially every month without needing the user to manually trigger the settlement processes. Here is the scenario.
1) The rebate agreement is valid from Jan to Dec
2) A partial settlement should run sometime during the 2nd week of the every month
3) While making the settlement, invoices created or amount accrued for the previous month only should be settled. Invoice or amount accrued for the first two weeks of next month should not be considered.
eg) Amount accrued in Jan will be settled mid Feb and amount accrued in Feb should be settled in mid Mar.
4) The partial settlement should happen automatically without the need of an user interaction.
Can you let me know how this can be achieved in SAP R/3 ECC 6.0.Looking forward for your suggestions.
Regards,
Pratheb
Hi,
We created Sales order and created deliveries but not invoiced.
Now the client wants to introduce new condition type in pricing procedure for the new sales orders.
I have few doubts,
When i create invoice for the previously created deliveries (i.e before addition of new condition),will this new condition type will impact in creating invoice (i.e a/c documents)-User wants new condition type should impact only for fresh Sales order and not for new ones.
Please guide me.
How to create a variant of VF04 or VF06 it should create individual billing?
During manual processing, in VF04 user can click on button "Individual billing document" and then for 1 reference document, 1 billing document will be created.
Thanks!
TW
Hi Experts,
We have a requirement where in two accounting documents need to be created for one billing document. The document type of the accounting document and G/L accounts will be different.
Please let me know if there is a way to achieve this?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bhanu
Hi All,
We have a return process, where we create a return order on UNKNOWN customer and do the delivery, in a situation where sold to and ship to are not confirmed for the order.This will be not relevant for billing(setting in item category) and again,it will be shown up in V.23. Then,we create a original order with real sold to and ship to with reference to the order created on UNKNOWN customer,and it is not relevant for delivery,release billing block in V.23 and creates billing,
My REQUIREMENT is whenever a original order is created with reference to Unknown order, the order with UNKNOWN customer should not appear in V.23.Can somebody suggest on this?
Hi SAP Guru and Expert,
Am currently configuring a new Condition type with G/L number assigned to it. Due to the requirement whereby the Posting Key 01 G/L account need to be picked up from the Condition type instead of the G/L code in CustomerMaster, I only maintain the new condition type with G/L in "Cust.Grp/Account Key" and "Cust.Grp/MaterialGrp/Account Key" as well as Acct Key in VKOA.
When I create SO the condition being picked up correctly, however when come to Billing Account Creation, the G/L code is not replacing the Customer master G/L code. As a result of that, please advise whether the G/L Code in Customer Master can be replaced by the G/L code in condition type.
Below is the print screen of my posting.
Is it possible for the condition Type G/L to replace the Customer Master G/L code upon Billing posting. Should I change the posting key config in the accounting document posting so that the correct posting key can be picked up and post to the desire G/L Code?
Thank you
Regards
Leonard Tan
Hi,
I need to know about the user exits that are called in determining the output type in SD Billing(V3).
Additionally, if i have a condition type where VBELN is used as a Billing Document, but i want it to be Sales Document(VBAK). In which user exit it is preferable to do it.
-Sahil
Dear Expert ,
I have a problem on the SD Pricing Procedure when we release Billing doc to Accounting Doc, the error code is FF 753 : The document entered contains a customer or vendor item with tax code A1. This does not occur in any of the G/L account or asset items.
This happens after I make changes on the pricing procedure, I removed two condition type that are not used anymore.
Earlier, in the pricing procedure, there are two condition types that are not used anymore, but two condition are assigned also in VKOA, so I have remove those assignment in there which relevant with AcctKey and G/L that used bye the condition removed.
From multiple threads, and the document I find, if something goes wrong like those error , I should check SAPNote: 395 919 and 112 609 and have been checking back.
I already check FTXP also for A1 tax code, the configuration is OK.
This Error is still appear til now , what should be check again ? I really need advice and solutions from all of you.
Thanks & regards,
Danang
Greetings,
We have done tax procedure migration for India from TAXINJ (formula based) to TAXINN (condition based). We changed our pricing procedures for new tax related conditions accordingly. As per standard documentation from SAP in migration related OSS note, for billing documents which are created in TAXINJ procedure and not passed to accounting pricing needs to be updated so new procedure is updated and system will not give tax code error and accounting document is created. Now we have few cancellation billing documents which are created during old TAXINJ pricing procedure which due to some account assignment issue (G/L account determination error) are not passed to accounting. Now account assignment issue is resolved and system is giving FICORE 704 'tax code not found in TAXINN procedure' error.
Update button in conditions tab is disabled (greyed out) at header as well as item level in these cancellation billing documents. So we are not able to update pricing for these documents and subsequently not able to pass the same to accounting. We had similar account assignment issue in billing documents but Update button was enabled (active) so we could update pricing procedures and create accounting documents.
Please suggest how we could update pricing in these cancellation billing documents which are not yet released to accounting.
Hi,
We created Sales order and created deliveries but not invoiced.
Now the client wants to introduce new condition type in pricing procedure for the new sales orders.
I have few doubts,
When i create invoice for the previously created deliveries (i.e before addition of new condition),will this new condition type will impact in creating invoice (i.e a/c documents)-User wants new condition type should impact only for fresh Sales order and not for new ones.
Please guide me.
Dear Gurus ,
when i am trying to reverse billing document through vf11 then system through error ( payment has been received against this demand).while no payment has received against this demand. Kindly proive solution. even my friends told me to raise this issue directely to sap
Hi Experts,
We have created a sales order with standard and substituted Item, here substituted Item is not relevant for delivery and billing.
With reference to this order we have done delivery and shipment document and now we are not able to create invoice for this document due to in completion log error in sales order (Message no. VU019). Here we are creating invoice with reference to delivery document.
I have also checked the in-completion log configuration(OVA2), here if order is incomplete than system should not allow to create delivery, PGI and invoices but here delivery and PGI has been done and stopping at only billing level (Refer the attached screenshot).
Please help us for processing the billing document.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Shatrughan